Competition breeds improvement.
A
monopoly is the only model for successful and happy companies.
The latter is
the theme of Peter Thiel’s new book Zero
to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future, highlighted in a new
profile by Fortune on the billionaire pioneer and, yes, philanthropist. The
former statement is one ingrained within us since grade school; whether
conscious of this or not, competition is synonymous with capitalism. Or is it.
Thiel, a contrarian by any stretch of the imagination- the man is a
libertarian, gay Christian- expels the conventional notion of capitalism and
competition. He states that they are “opposites….under perfect competition, all
profits get competed away”. Instead the real money is in monopolies, “All happy
companies are different: Each one earns a monopoly by solving a unique problem.
All failed companies are the same: They failed to escape competition.”
It is upon this statement I wish to
speak. News broke today that Gilead, an established biotechnology company, was
in discussions with generic drug makers in foreign countries about partnering
to bring it’s wildly successful Sovaldi compound, a drug that is shown to cure
90% of hepatitis C patients (a conservative figure), to other nations at an
obvious discount. Never mind that this information should be built into the
stock, when they announced these plans a month ago. Never mind that Gilead
already does this with its HIV drug. Never mind that this expands Gilead’s
reach in the growing hepatitis C epidemic. Instead the market sent Gilead down
by as much as 8% today, touching $97.55 on volume exceeding average daily
volume merely hours into the day.
Sure it would be a great time to
take profits in Gilead after it has nearly doubled its share price in the last
52 weeks. But something about the volume today (Read: Fear, Panic, Pandemonium) tells me the people who sold
haven’t been in this stock since it was trading at $58.81 52 weeks ago. These
people didn’t fail to escape competition; they refused to compete in the first
place, even when all signs said that Gilead was laying the groundwork for a
global monopoly. This behavior is why capitalism and free markets succeed, let alone exist. There will always be emotional rip tides to profit from.
Right now the biggest risk to Gilead is competitors competing
with them on price. Well the first step to doing this is introducing a drug
that is at least as effective or more effective than Sovaldi, something that
has yet to be done. The day will come when Merck, or the other big pharms, come
up with a successful and effective compound that cures hepatitis C, but it may
be too late. They might be best advised to concentrate their efforts on curing
fatty liver disease, a growing concern right here in the United States. Gilead
has the advantage of being first and all the perks that come with it. They have
an established product that cures one of the worst diseases in the world,
albeit at a steep price. Ask Dell how it fared on competing with Apple on
price.
By setting up shop in foreign
markets, where hepatitis C inducing conditions can be even worse than in the
U.S., Gilead is introducing dynamic pricing. Yes people get bent out of shape
over the cost for the entire cure in India rumored to be less than the cost of a single pill in
the U.S., but I’m sure I don’t have to remind you that in the U.S. a liver
transplant costs half a million dollars. The best argument justifying Sovaldi's high sticker price comes from a July report from the California Healthcare Institute where near the end of the report they mention the following concerning Solvadi's price:
Interestingly, previous treatment regimens for hep C cost the same or more (depending on the length of treatment), take at least twice as long to administer, are less effective and can often require other health care services.
$84,000 is a significant amount of money and I am not trying to be deliberately insensitive here (okay, I am) but this tweet basically sums up my thoughts about these fearful investors:
Interestingly, previous treatment regimens for hep C cost the same or more (depending on the length of treatment), take at least twice as long to administer, are less effective and can often require other health care services.
$84,000 is a significant amount of money and I am not trying to be deliberately insensitive here (okay, I am) but this tweet basically sums up my thoughts about these fearful investors:
...and here i thought turkmenistan would be able to support sovaldi for 84k $GILD
— zach (@zbiotech) September 5, 2014
Fear is the killer of competition,
and it leads to panic. Gilead’s stock closed today at $105.06, down 1.68% for
the day, but a far cry from the $97.55 it plummeted to in haste this morning. I
don’t need to lament how if you bought on the “bad news” you’d already be up a
substantial percent. While the jury may still be out on Peter Thiel’s theory on
monopolies one thing is for certain; the behemoth corporations that exist today
didn’t get anywhere acting out of fear. Instead they preyed on it.
Follow Wesley Vaughan on twitter @bragavaughan
Disclosure: I am long Gilead.
No comments:
Post a Comment